Crypto Mining & AI Compute Overlap
Data Center  Demand vs supply & the price of exposure · unit of demand: MW of dual-use compute capacity
RIOTMARACIFRHUTBTBT
V2 · factsJun 2026
Sector scan: Financial Services Group-level demand/supply Updated Jun 2, 2026 Facts only · no recommendation
Snapshot Product Demand Supply The gap The players The price Deep-dive next Sources

Snapshot

Five publicly traded Bitcoin miners — RIOT, MARA, CIFR, HUT, BTBT — collectively control roughly 5.7 GW of developed or pipeline power capacity across US data center sites. All five are converting portions of that capacity from cryptocurrency mining (ASIC-based, single-purpose) to dual-use AI/HPC hosting (GPU-based, leased to hyperscalers). Combined market capitalization is approximately $42 billion as of June 2, 2026. Of the five, only HUT and CIFR have signed multi-billion-dollar hyperscaler leases; RIOT has a $311M AMD contract; MARA and BTBT have zero signed AI tenant leases.

~5.7 GW est.
Combined power pipeline (all stages)
~$42B
Combined market cap (Jun 2, 2026)
597 MW
HUT contracted AI leases (largest of five)
$0
Combined AI/HPC revenue — Q1 2026 (ex-RIOT fit-out, HUT compute)
~$25B+
Total contracted AI lease value (CIFR + HUT)

The product & how money is made

The product is powered, cooled, permitted data center capacity, measured in megawatts (MW) of critical IT load — the electricity delivered directly to servers after cooling and distribution losses. One MW of critical IT load supports roughly 125 NVIDIA H100 GPUs or 60-80 GB200 GPUs at full density. est.

These companies make money three ways:

Demand

Contracted

Broader market demand

Goldman Sachs projects US data center power demand to grow 165% by 2030. est. McKinsey estimates $7 trillion of cumulative global data center investment needed by 2030. est. Hyperscalers (AWS, Microsoft, Google, Meta) have collectively guided to $200B+ of capex in 2025. Grid interconnection queues in ERCOT (Texas) and PJM (Ohio-Virginia) run 36-55 months, creating a structural bottleneck that benefits holders of existing interconnected power.

Market-size and growth figures are third-party estimates, not live-verified. Company financials are from most recent public filings. For SEC-verified deep dives, see Stock Reports.

Supply

Capacity by company (all stages)

CompanyDeveloped MWPipeline MWTotal MWKey sites
RIOT1,262~438~1,700Corsicana TX (1 GW at full build), Rockdale TX (700 MW), Kentucky (162 MW)
MARA~1,277~923~2,200Long Ridge OH (505 MW gas plant + 200 MW DC), plus sites across PJM, ERCOT, SPP, international
CIFR~300~2,900~3,200Barber Lake (AWS, 300 MW), Black Pearl (retrofit), Colchis TX (1 GW, AEP interconnect, 2028)
HUT~1,000~9,600~10,600Beacon Point TX (1 GW campus), River Bend LA (245 MW + 1 GW ROFO), ~dozen legacy sites
BTBT~24~176~200NC-1 Madison NC (24 MW live, 200 MW target), MTL-3 Quebec, Iceland

Sources: RIOT Q1 2026 10-Q, MARA Long Ridge PR (Apr 2026), CIFR Q3 2025 & Q1 2026 updates, HUT Q1 2026 10-Q & Beacon Point PR (May 2026), BTBT WhiteFiber PR & Q1 2026 10-Q.

Bottlenecks

The gap

MetricBitcoin MiningAI/HPC Hosting
Revenue per MW per year~$0.3-0.5M est.~$9-10M est.
EBITDA margin30-50% est.80-90% est.
Contract durationNone (spot)10-15 years
Revenue visibilityZero (BTC price × difficulty)Triple-net, take-or-pay
Tenant credit qualityN/AInvestment-grade (AWS, Google, AMD)
Capex to build/convert$0.5-1M/MW est.$3-5M/MW est.

Mining revenue/MW implied from RIOT/MARA Q1 2026 filings (total mining revenue / energized MW). AI revenue/MW from IREN's disclosed Microsoft economics (~$9.7M/MW/yr) and industry sources. est.

CoreWeave data shows 10 MW of NVIDIA H100 GPUs generates revenue equivalent to ~100 MW of Bitcoin mining. est. The April 2024 Bitcoin halving cut mining revenue per MW roughly in half, while AI lease rates have risen as hyperscaler demand has grown faster than shell supply.

The players

Ticker Mkt Cap Price Total Pipeline AI MW Contracted AI Lease Value Q1 2026 Rev BTC Held Total Debt Cash
RIOT $10.3B $27.32 1.7 GW 50 MW $311M $145M 15,679 $877M $234M
MARA $5.4B $14.28 2.2 GW 0 MW $0 $175M 35,303 $2.4B $514M
CIFR $10.8B $26.29 3.2 GW ~600 MW ~$8.5B $35M ~$76M worth $4.4B $715M
HUT $15.0B $133.02 10.6 GW 597 MW $16.8B $71M 16,331 $405M $160M
BTBT $691M $1.98 0.2 GW 0 MW $0 $28M ~155K ETH $334M $80M

Prices and market caps as of June 2, 2026. Pipeline MW from company disclosures (includes all stages: operating, development, evaluation). RIOT Q1 revenue includes $33.2M data center segment (fit-out services + operating lease). BTBT holds ETH rather than BTC as primary digital asset treasury. HUT pipeline of 10.6 GW includes 6.8 GW "under evaluation" — early-stage.

Key distinctions

The price of exposure

TickerMkt CapPipeline GW$/MW (total pipeline)$/MW (contracted AI only)EV / Contracted AI Lease Value
RIOT$10.3B1.7$6.1M$206M~35x
MARA$5.4B2.2$2.5MN/A (no leases)N/A
CIFR$10.8B3.2$3.4M$18M~1.8x
HUT$15.0B10.6$1.4M$25.1M~0.9x
BTBT$691M0.2$3.5MN/A (no leases)N/A

EV / Contracted AI Lease Value = enterprise value / total base-term contracted AI lease value. HUT at 0.9x: market prices the stock below the undiscounted sum of its 15-year contracted lease cash flows. CIFR at 1.8x: market pays 1.8x the base-term lease value. For RIOT, MARA, and BTBT, contracted AI lease value is too small or zero for this ratio to be meaningful.

All five are currently unprofitable on a GAAP basis (net losses driven by BTC mark-to-market, share-based compensation, and heavy capital deployment). None pays a dividend. All are diluting shareholders — RIOT's share count grew 17.6% YoY, and convertible debt across the group adds potential dilution of tens of millions of shares per company.

BTC/ETH treasury is a significant variable. MARA's 35,303 BTC (~$2.4B at $68K) = ~44% of market cap. RIOT's 15,679 BTC (~$1.1B) = ~10% of market cap. BTBT's ~155K ETH (~$327M) = ~47% of market cap. est.

What to deep-dive next

Sources & confidence

Confidence: Company-specific MW, lease values, and financials from SEC filings and official press releases — high confidence. Revenue-per-MW economics for AI hosting inferred from IREN's Microsoft disclosure and industry sources — moderate confidence. Mining revenue per MW back-calculated from reported financials — moderate confidence. Demand forecasts (Goldman Sachs, McKinsey) — directional only.